In most societies, there are rules, regulations and laws. They are there to protect each citizen and maintain social cohesion. When for instance somebody in our society is murdered, the killer needs to be brought to justice not only to safeguard the people but also to maintain law and order.
In pretty much any murder case, the most challenging part is gathering hard evidence. If there is not enough hard evidence or there is ‘no’ evidence it means that there is ‘no’ case. Evidence is the key. However, the more corrupt the system of any society is the less important evidence becomes, especially if there is a lot at stake or a lot to gain. Too many times completely innocent people have been jailed without any hard evidence. It is not only morally wrong but very dangerous as well, imagine it was you who got framed and put away for life.
The World Health Organisation (WHO), Governments around the world, and their health advisory committee’s have been telling us with great certainty and conviction that people are getting killed by a serial killer named SARS-CoV-2 (the virus). They say that the virus is dangerous and can kill at any time. They tell us that this virus killer is going after elderly people but occasionally kills younger people as well.
You probably can imagine that every murder case has its own challenges but this serial murder case has challenges beyond belief. Because the WHO, all Governments around the world and all their health advisory committees (doctors, scientists, virologists) have not been able to produce one shred of hard evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is the serial killer. In fact, there is no shred of hard evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus actually has been isolated, purified and therefore exists.
But it does not stop there, the alleged countless murders perpetrated by this alleged serial killer SARS-CoV-2 virus are in fact not murders but are yearly re-occurring deaths that can be viewed in Government statistical publications. Did you know that worldwide there are “no more excess deaths than in previous epidemic flue seasons”?
In a democratic society, it used to be the law that you must produce hard evidence before you can convict somebody of murder. But now the WHO, all Governments around the world and their health advisory committees are trying to convince the jury (us the people) that the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus is the cause of yearly re-occurring excess deaths.
NO records can be found indicating SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated. “Isolated” means “separated from other material.” It means, “we actually found the virus and could identify it.”
ACTUAL ISOLATION MEANS THE VIRUS EXISTS. INABILITY TO ISOLATE IT MEANS THERE IS NO PROOF OF THE VIRUS’ EXISTENCE. THIS MEANS THERE IS NO CASE!
“Critical thinking citizens around the world are now utilising the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), demanding from their Governments and their various health departments scientific proof that this virus exists.“
One of those critical thinking citizens is Christine Messay, she indicates 46 separate agencies (Government) that say the same thing—“no records of isolation available”—we are past wondering what is going on. We’re firmly in the territory of FRAUD.
I could not agree more. All my previous research concludes that not only the virus SARS-CoV-2 does not exist, but all the COVID-19 measurements including the RT-PCR test, are unscientific, utterly ineffective and ridiculous (see previous blog posts).
Freedom of Information (FOI) reveal that health/science institutions around the world have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever!
Please read the work of ‘Christine Messay’ below :
Would a sane person mix a patient sample (containing various sources of genetic material and never proven to contain any particular virus) with transfected monkey kidney cells, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs, then claim that the resulting concoction is “SARS-COV-2 isolate” and ship it off internationally for use in critical research (including vaccine and test development)?
Because that’s the sort of fraudulent monkey business that’s being passed off as “virus isolation” by research teams around the world.
Just 1 of many examples is shown below – this is from a study cited by the Australian Department of Health as a paper “which led to the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in culture“. (Can you spot the oxymoron in that quote?)
If you are new to the topic of “virus isolation/purification”, I strongly recommend reading the Statement On Virus Isolation by Dr Andrew Kaufman, Dr Thomas Cowan and Sally Fallon Morell, MA. (Click here)
A colleague in New Zealand (Michael S.) and I (CM) have been submitting Freedom of Information requests to institutions in various countries seeking records that describe the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus from any unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient.
Our requests have not been limited to records of isolation performed by the respective institution or limited to records authored by the respective institution, rather they were open to any records describing “COVID-19 virus” isolation/purification performed by anyone, ever, anywhere on the planet.
Thus far (February 21, 2021) 19 Canadian institutions have provided their responses:
Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (re “the variant”)
Region of Peel (Ontario)
KFL&A Public Health (Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington, Ontario, re “any variant”)
(note that researchers from the last 4 institutions had publicly claimed to have “isolated the virus”, as had VIDO-Intervac).
Every institution has indicated the same: that they searched their records and located none describing the isolation of any “COVID-19 virus” directly from a patient sample that was not first adulterated with other sources of genetic material. (Those other sources are typically monkey kidney aka “Vero” cells and fetal bovine serum).
The response from 1 additional Canadian institution is long overdue:
Public Health Ontario (request submitted July 16, 2020)
Click on the above links to access the responses from Canadian institutions. Scroll further down this page for responses from institutions outside of Canada.
Here are 2 compilation pdfs containing ~60 responses from 47 institutions in 10 countries re the isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2”
Last updated February 12, 2021 (note: some of these responses were obtained by FOI-submitters other than Michael S. and myself, as indicated further down this page):
Part 1: (click here).
Part 2: (click here).
Check back here (the page you are currently on) for regular updates. As of March 13, 2021: 52 institutions and offices have responded thus far, and none have provided or cited any record describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation. Note that some institutions failed to fully co-operate. The University of Auckland and Public Health Wales.
(And yes, we are aware of the many publications wherein authors claim to have “isolated the virus”. We’ve looked at numerous such studies and have yet to see one where they actually did so. Claiming to have done something and actually doing it are sometimes 2 different things, even in peer-reviewed science. And yes we are aware of the many published alleged “SARS-COV-2 genomes” – these were in fact manufactured, not discovered. And yes we are aware that EM photos have been published, allegedly of “the virus”, however, a photo of something does not tell you what the thing is, where it came from or what it does. One has to scrutinise the Methods used to “isolate the virus” / obtain said photos / obtain alleged genomes, and that is when absolutely everything falls apart with “COVID-19”.)
FOI responses from institutions in the U.S., New Zealand, Australia, U.K., England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Denmark, Spain, European CDC, Slovenia, etc
A big Thank You to all the individuals who have now kindly shared additional FOI responses that they obtained re-isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2”. Some prefer to remain anonymous, others are named below.
Also note that we have included below responses from the U.S. CDC and a couple of New Zealand institutions in regards to isolation/purification of a number of other alleged “viruses”, i.e. “HIV”, “Ebola virus”, “Zika virus”, 2003 “SARS-COV”, any common cold “coronavirus”, any “virus” on NZ’s “immunization” schedule. Again, none have yielded any records or citations of records describing the isolation/purification of any virus.
[We also await responses from the CDC re the alleged “pandemic influenza viruses” “A(H1N1)pdm09”, “H3N2”, “H2N2” and “H1N1”, and alleged “viruses” that Dr Judy Mikovits claims have been isolated (“XMRV”, “HTLV1”, “HTLV-III/LAV”) (see Dr Mikovits’ claims here and at 86:25-88:11 and 112:30-113:15 here.)]
As this next link, you will see the same type of “no records” FOI response from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR), dated November 2, 2020: (click here)
On March 1, 2021, once again the CDC made clear that they still have no records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation performed by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever… just not in so many words. Instead, the CDC absurdly implied that isolation of “SARS-COV-2” would require the replication of a “virus” without host cells and thus is impossible (click here)
March 3, 2021: CDC again fails to provide/cite any records describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification by anyone anywhere ever… BUT will no longer simply say so (as they did back on November 2nd); instead, they give song and dance and cite their own fraudulent study (by Harcourt et al.): (click here)
[Note that someone kindly forwarded another FOI response from the CDC dated December 30, 2020, re the alleged 2003 “SARS-COV-1” and all “common cold coronaviruses” – the CDC has no record of any having been isolated. Here is a temporary pdf of the redacted letter…. a better pdf one will follow: (click here).
And… March 15, 2021, CDC FOIA response: no records of any “Ebolavirus” isolation/purification by anyone, anywhere, ever: (click here).
And… March 19, 2021, U.S. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) admit they have no record of any “Zika virus” isolated/purified from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever: (click here).
And… March 23, 2021, CDC admitted in an FOIA response that they have no record of any “HIV” purified/isolated from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever.
[Please note: you might notice a strange reference to “influenza” in my FOIA request, however, this detail did not affect the request in any way because the reference was in the context of me giving any example of the sort of record I was looking for. The reference was the result of sloppy editing on my part … I had recycled my earlier FOI request to the CDC repurification of any “influenza virus”, and neglected to edit that part when adapting the text for my HIV request: (click here).
Ron Bublitz asked the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH) the question shown below. His correspondence is posted at the following link, along with the evasive response provided by the NIH/NIAID Section Chief for Controlled Correspondence and Public Inquiries, Legislative Affairs and Correspondence Management Branch (click here) Here is a pdf showing the text and a photo of the actual emails: (click here)
Ron kindly provided a screenshot of his communications with NIAID, shown below.
Note that NIH/NIAID failed to answer any of Ron Bublitz’s questions and merely cited a CDC study that indulged in the typical fraudulent “monkey business” approach to so-called “isolation” – as shown in the screenshot below). NIAID’s response strongly suggests that they too have no records of any isolated/purified “SARS-COV-2”.
This is the same study that Dr Thomas Cowan recently wrote about (“Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’“) where he also addressed the fraudulent nature of the authors’ fabricated “SARS-COV-2 genome” (as shown in the screenshot below).
The Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport provided/cited for the requester no records of actual purification and control experiments to show “SARS-CoV-2” exists: (click here).
New Zealand’s Ministry of Health and NZ’s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research admitted they have no records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation: (click here).
Here are 5 pages of pure gold, evidencing masterful evasion plus stunning incompetence and/or fraud from New Zealand’s Ministry of Health. Instead of providing the requests records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification and proof of accurate diagnostic tests, they blathered about genomes and cultures of the never-isolated imaginary virus; stated that PCR tests have been validated around the world and are the gold standard; and cited a February 2020 preliminary report (“The Pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 Transgenic Mice”) that used the so-called “SARS-COV-2” strain that had been concocted by Zhu et al. and claimed that Koch’s Postulates had been fulfilled: (click here).
No records describing the isolation of SARS-COV-2 from a sample not already adulterated with other genetic material admits New Zealand’s Department of the Prime Minister & Cabinet:(click here)
March 22, 2021, New Zealand’s Ministry of Health, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and the NZ Cabinet confirm they still have no record describing purification of “the virus” and hence zero proof of its existence, and they choose to cite fraudulent studies instead (the infamous Harcourt et al. study mentioned above and the Australian paper cited at the top of this page). Full pdf response: (click here).
The New Zealand’s University of Auckland was disappointingly non-cooperative, the only institution as of October 8th failing to simply admit that they have no such records, opting instead for a sketchy “refusal” of my colleague’s request. Let’s face it, if the University actually had any such records (that no one else on the planet appears to have) and they are publicly available, the University of Auckland would have proudly provided links/citations. But they didn’t: (click here).
The New Zealand’s University of Otago, where Professor Miguel Quiñones-Mateu, PhD claimed months ago to have “isolated the virus”, responded that they too have “no records” describing the isolation of SARS-COV-2 from a sample not already adulterated with other genetic material: (click here).
March 30, 2021, New Zealand’s University of Otago confirm they still have no record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification, by anyone anywhere. Full response pdf here: (click here).
New Zealand‘s Ministry of Health admits to having no records describing the isolation of ANY virus listed on NZ’s Immunisation Schedule: (click here).
NZ’s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research also admits to having no records describing the isolation of ANY virus listed on NZ’s Immunisation Schedule and equates “isolation” with culturing: (click here)
New Zealand‘s Ministry of Health obviously has no record describing the isolation of the alleged 2003 “SARS-COV” or any “common cold coronavirus” by anyone, anywhere, ever, but wasn’t willing to admit such. Instead, they falsely implied that Michael S. had asked for things he had not asked for: (click here).
New Zealand’s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research once again equate “isolation” with culturing and this time admits to having no record re-isolation of “SARS-COV-1” or any “virus” on NZ’s Immunisation Schedule and simply “ignored” a query re-isolation of any “common cold coronaviruses”. I think we know the answer though, don’t we? (click here).
March 9, 2021: New Zealand’s Institute of Environmental Science and Research admits that they still have no record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification (performed by anyone on the planet, anywhere, ever): (click here).
One of New Zealand’s Associate Ministers of Health Jenny Salesa has “no records”: (click here)
Another of New Zealand’s Associate Ministers of Health Julie Anne Genter has “no records”: (click here).
And another of New Zealand’s Associate Ministers of Health Peeni Henare has “no records”: (click here).
Same, “no records,” says Bay of Plenty District Health Board, Tauranga Hospital, New Zealand: (click here).
At this next link, you will find an interesting “no records” FOI response from Australia’s Department of Health: (click here).
Same admission from Australia’s Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity (which had publicly claimed to have “isolated the virus”).
March 22, 2021, Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation still have no record of any “SARS-COV-2” purified from a patient, by anyone, anywhere: (click here).
The following FOI letter is in response to a request that was submitted on the advice of Australia’s Department of Health and has come to us via John Blaid. Addressed to Mary-Jane Liddicoat, the formal (but undated) letter that was authored sometime after March 9, 2021, by the ACT Government (aka Government of the Australian Capital Territory) / Canberra Health Services (CHS) advises that CHS holds no records relevant to the topic of isolating (aka purifying) the alleged “SARS-COV-2”. The entire pdf letter from CHS is posted here: (click here).
[BONUS: Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation – CSIRO (“Australia’s national science research agency”) also admits to having no record describing the isolation of ANY virus on Australia’s national “immunization” schedule, by anyone, anywhere, ever: (click here).
No records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation, admits the U.K. Department of Health and Social Care (note: there are not 1, not 2, not 3, but 4 such responses from DHSC – the most recent dated November 23, 2020): (click here).
[Note The U.K. Department of Health and Social Care has kept us waiting for 2 months already on an FOI request for (at most) 3 days worth of analysis on their alleged “new variant” announced by Matt Hancock on December 14 2020: (click here).
Same, from the UK’s Government Office for Science: (click here).
Here is a sketchy FOI reply from the U.K. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (obtained by Mr Athanasios Kandias). The agency provided/cited no records re “SARS-COV-2” isolation. Their response includes an (apparently fraudulent) claim that such records are available in the public domain, but they provided zero links/citations despite having been asked for the location of any such records. Excerpts are shown below. Full response: (click here).
Pdf: (click here).
Regarding “BNT162b2”, the mRNA ingredient in the Pfizer-BioNTech “Covid-19 vaccine”, that is allegedly transcribed from the alleged corresponding genetic template that allegedly encodes the alleged viral spike (S) protein of the alleged “SARS-COV-2 virus”, U.K. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency admitted to investigative journalist Frances Leader that the genetic template on which it (“BNT162b2”) is based “does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person“, rather it “was generated via a combination of gene synthesis and recombinant DNA technology“. The email exchange is available here: (click here).
and in a pdf here: (click here).
No EM photos of purified “SARS-COV-2”, no peer-reviewed paper with the genome of purified “SARS-COV-2”, no proof that “the virus” causes “COVID-19”, etc — says UK’s Cabinet Office in response to the queries shown below from Bartholomeus Lakeman; full letter here: (click here) and preserved here: (click here).
No records re-isolation of “SARS-COV-2” from an unadulterated sample, says the UK’s House of Commons, in response to a query from Marc Horn: (click here).
Same, for the 2nd time from Public Health Scotland in response to my colleague in NZ: (click here).
Public Health Wales provided Dr. Janet Menage a sketchy excuse for not properly assisting with her request (Dr. Menage has submitted a complaint to the PHW ‘Corporate Complaints’ team); see PHW’s response here: (click here)
Here is a 2nd & more recent dodgy response from Public Health Wales yielding no record, or citation of any record, of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification done by anyone, anywhere, ever: (click here).
Below is a screenshot of a Freedom of Information response from the University College Dublin, explaining that the details. Ireland’s National Virus Reference Laboratory has no records describing “how the Novel Coronavirus was purified“: (click here)
Statens Serum Institut, Denmark told Alex Holmsted that (translation): “The Statens Serum Institut can state that we have now carried out a journal search for documentation that has convinced the Statens Serum Institut about the real existence of SARS-CoV-2, the alleged cause of COVID19 and moreover, we have in some other way tried to locate relevant documents. Statens Serum Institut can note that we are not in possession of the requested documents...”: (click here).
April 2020: Public Health England admits using fake virus material to evaluate “COVID-19” tests, the gold standard is not an isolated virus and more: (click here).
No records re-isolation of “SARS-COV-2” from an unadulterated sample, Public Health England told Andrew Johnson, a Technology Tutor at a UK University: (click here). This is Andrew’s write-up on his FOI request: (click here)
Months ago, the StandUpX Science Committee published an open letter dated June 22, 2020, to the British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson. Below is a screenshot from their letter, demanding scientific proof of the alleged “COVID-19 virus”. (Their entire letter can be viewed and/or downloaded here: (click here).
StandUpX Committee member Piers Corbyn also made the demand verbally outside the headquarters of the UK government; video footage of the demand is available at this URL (not the embedded video below – that is a different video featuring Piers Corbyn; WordPress would not embed the footage of the demand for some reason, so please click on this URL to see the demand, not on the image below: (click here).
Below is footage of Piers Corbyn B.Sc. in Physics, M.Sc. in Astrophysics calling out the UK government for the non-isolation of their theoretical “SARS-COV-2 virus”: (click here): In the description underneath the video (on the Bitchute page) the authors of the publication on the Drosten PCR test are referred to as ‘Drosten et al when it should read ‘Croman et al’.
StandUpX has a petition entitled “If there’s no proof the virus exists end all Lockdowns/Masks/Trax/Vax actions“. If you can tell the difference between isolation and fraudulent monkey business, please consider signing it, here: (click here).
In April StandUpX committee member Dr Kevin Corbett MSc PhD (@KPCResearch on Twitter) published a paper describing issues around the non-isolation of the theoretical SARS-COV-2 virus. Below is a screenshot from his paper entitled “WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE ‘NOVEL CORONAVIRUS’, ‘SARS-CoV-2’, AND THE ACCURACY OF THE TESTS?”, which you may access here: (click here).
Guess “WHO” advised Public Health England (and the rest of the world) not to isolate “the virus” as a routine diagnostic procedure, and “WHO” encourages the conflation of isolation with culturing? See the screenshots below from page 4 of the Interim Guidance document dated March 2, 2020 “Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in suspected human cases” kindly provided by Dr Corbett of StandUpX: (click here) and page 8 of the Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 Interim guidance 11 September 2020: (click here).
Update, October 1, 2020: My colleague in New Zealand recently received a “no records” response from Public Health England – identical to the “no records” response above that was already provided to Andrew Johnson. You may access this 2nd response from PHE: (click here).
Update November 1, 2020: Marc Horn also queried Public Health England for records describing “SARS-COV-2 isolation” from a sample not unadulterated with additional genetic material. Response: no records: (click here).
Another “no records” FOI response from Public Health England dated November 3, 2020, in response to a request from Athanasios Kandias for records (re SARS-COV-2 isolation) held by the National Biological Standards Board:
(click here), preserved (click here).
No records supporting the claim that the alleged “SARS-COV-2 virus” causes “COVID-19” symptoms says Public Health England, in response to a query from Marc Horn. Note that PHE cited 3 publicly available studies, none involving isolation of “SARS-COV-2” from a sample not unadulterated with additional genetic material: (click here).
No records supporting the claim that the alleged “SARS-COV-2 virus” causes “COVID-19” symptoms, says the UK’s House of Commons, in response to a query from Marc Horn: (click here).
No records supporting the claim that the alleged “SARS-COV-2 virus” causes “COVID-19” symptoms, says the UK’s House of Lords, in response to a query from Marc Horn: (click here).
Britain’s Health and Safety Executive confirmed for Athanasios Kandias on November 3, 2020, that they hold no information relating to the isolation of “SARS-COV-2”: (click here) preserved (click here).
Imperial College London managed to provide/cite zero records in their wildly un-informative Freedom of Information response dated March 12, 2021, re-isolation/purification of the imaginary “SARS-COV-2” (by anyone, anywhere, ever): (click here).
Kepa Ormazabal submitted a Freedom of Information request to Spain’s Ministry of Health for bibliographic records of studies describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation (“the term “isolation” is used in the sense given by the Real Academia Espanola Dictionary”); the Ministry’s response yielded no records: (click here).
The Director of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Andrea Ammon, has admitted to having no documentation, even for the ECDC’s methodology to prove that a virus exists, let alone proof of SARS-COV-2: (click here)
According to the website of Slovenia’s University of Ljubljana, the Faculty of Medicine, there has been involved in “…implementation of the latest molecular diagnostic procedures; an attempt to isolate the virus in cell cultures [an oxymoron], which is a precondition for testing antiviral agents and vaccines…“. The Faculty formally admitted on November 30, 2020, to having no record (even obtained from others) of “SARS-COV-2” isolation or proving a causal link to “COVID-19”; also that 40 PCR cycles have been used across Slovenia since the beginning of testing. The Faculty’s original response and an English translation are available here: (click here).
Hall of Shame
The FOI request shown below was submitted to Germany’s Federal Ministry of Health by Michael S. on August 9, 2020, and has been completely ignored. I think we know the answer though, don’t we?
Pdf: (click here).
Here is an exasperating email exchange between myself and Imperial College London, home of the disgraced “COVID-19” modeller Professor Neil Ferguson and Public Health England’s Deputy Director of National Infection Service and Director of Reference Microbiology Services, British virologist, Professor Maria Zambon FMedSci FRCPath. The College clearly has no records describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification but is unwilling to admit such: (click here).
If you are asking yourself what is really happening, why there are lockdowns and why people are required to be vaccinated? You may like to read a few of my previous blog posts entitled, “OUR FREEDOMS AND HEALTH ARE AT STAKE, BUT NOT DUE TO A VIRUS” (click here) and, “MAJOR INSIGHTS IN HOW THE ‘CONTROLLERS’ FOOL THE ENTIRE WORLD POPULATION” (click here). These two blog posts will help you to comprehend the wider context as to why and what is happening and most likely what is to follow.
We must help each other to see through the smoke and mirrors. Our freedom and health are at stake here. Ignorance is the root cause of all disease, stress, and evil. But being in the know and feeling connected to your own innate wisdom will bring joy, happiness and success in one’s life.