mRNA ‘VACCINE’: FORCIBLY INJECT ME AND I WOULD SUE FOR ATTEMPTED MURDER – PROF. DOLORES CAHILL

For the last 10 months, I have researched and studied intrinsically this so-called pandemic (plandemic). I have carefully observed what Governments are doing in Australia, the USA, UK and The Netherlands. It is not good!

I have paid close attention to the health advisory recommendations that these Governments have received from WHO and their national advisory committees. Further, I scrutinised what the Leaders, Health & Justice Ministers of these four Governments have said and implemented since the WHO announced a worldwide pandemic.

I then compared their information, advice, regulations and so-called’ necessary ‘new laws’ to what independent top virologist, epidemiologist, biologist, toxicologist, neurologists, doctors, nurses, psychologists, independent journalists, whistleblowers, PCR & Vaccine manufacturers, lawyers and barristers had to say.

What if the following is all based on a lie, what will you do?

• COVID -19 Pandemic

• New regulations

• New Laws

• RT-PCR testing

• Quarantine

• Lockdowns

• 1.5-meter distance

• Wearing masks

• Disinfecting hands

• Vaccinations

• Curfew (evening clock)

Prof. Dolores Cahill who was interviewed in December 2020 by Liam Glavin is exposing a part of the lie which is the vaccine however is not talking truth about the alleged Sars-CoV-2 virus or virusses in general. Having said that she is talking about the danger about vaccines and that is worth listening to. Is she controlled oposition most likely how can it be that she does not act scientifically when it comes to the evidence of SARS-CoV-2 virus. Where is the scientific proof?

Brief Overview:

Dolores is an Inventor, Founder and Shareholder of Companies have been Granted & licensed Patents in Europe, USA & worldwide with applications in improving the early accurate diagnosis of disease (autoimmune diseases & cancer). Her latest ventures are the World Freedom Alliance and FreedomAirway.

With more than 20 years expertise in high-throughput protein & antibody array, proteomics technology development, automation & biomedical applications in biomarker discovery, diagnostics & personalised medicine.

Selected experience as Expert in EU over the past 15 years: EU Future & Emerging technologies (FETOPEN) Innovation Launchpad; EU Innovation Radar Expert, EU Horizon 2020 Societal Challenges 1 (Health).

Holds several granted and licensed international patents (EU, USA, Japan, Australia) (1995-present) and peer-reviewed publications, and reports,

Professor, University College Dublin (2005-present)

Group Leader, Max-Planck-Institute, Berlin, Germany (1995-2003)

Supervisor of completed PhD & Masters’ degree students in Germany and Ireland.

Co-founded Protagen AG in Dortmund (https://protagen.com/) (1996-2019) as a spin-out of the Max-Planck-Institute, Berlin to commercialise her diagnostic, companion diagnostic and personalised medicine applications of her discoveries. Protagen has screened and profiled the autoantibody repertoire of over 20,000 patients (https://protagen.com/data-and-insight/scientific-publications/)

Protagen Protein Services (https://protagenproteinservices.com/) a spin-off company of Protagen since 2013 – expertise in protein, antibody, proteomics and peptide contract services to the pharmaceutical industry and health care sectors.

Policy and Strategy: Developing Research Infrastructure Sustainability & Integrated Healthcare Systems:

Over 15 years supporting initiatives to integrate research, biobanking, electronic health records in the health care sector, including the integration of Biobanking & Biomarker Network (http://education.crdi.ie/page/g/s/91) and a long-term supporter of Biobanking Ireland, led by Prof. Eoin Gaffney (http://www.biobankireland.com/) and Clinical Research Development Ireland (https://www.crdi.ie/research/innovation/innovation-biographies/).

Scientific Review Board Member of the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe) (2016-2020) evaluating research funding grant applications for Cancer research, including Clinical Trials in Germany. (https://www.krebshilfe.de/informieren/ueber-uns/deutsche-krebshilfe/about-us-deutsche-krebshilfegerman-cancer-aid/)

Member of the German International Science Advisory Review Board of the German Translational Medicine in Cancer (2010 – 2017) Strategic Programme funded by the German Department Health and the BMBF/DLF in Germany (http://www.dkfz.de/en/presse/pressemitteilungen/2011/dkfz-pm-11-24-German-Consortium-for-Translational-Cancer-Research-Gets-Started.php).

Member, Irish Government’s Advisory Science Council (ASC) Member (science council.ie) (2005-2013) for Science, Technology & Innovation.

Dolores was an ASC Task Force member on ASC Policy Reports on ‘Promoting Enterprise-Higher Education Relationships’ (2009) & ‘Sustainability of Research Centres’ (2012).

Dolores chaired the ASC Task Force for Government Policy ‘Towards a Framework for Researcher Careers’ (2008).

Seconded National Expert (SNE) (2013-2014) to the European Commission Research and Innovation Directorate, in a Strategy and Policy Development role for International R&D&I Cooperation.

Award from the Federation of European Biochemical Societies Award in Norway Research and its significance.

Awarded BMBF BioFuture Prize by German Minister of Science.

Recent Article on the recognition and prevention of medical errors and adverse events: Medical Errors & Adverse Events: leading cause of death and disease burden. Dolores J. Cahill. (Health Europa Nov 2018: 7:42-43) (http://edition.pagesuite-professional.co.uk/html5/reader/production/default.aspx?pubname=&edid=73e202a8-1e25-4d2e-afc3-1cd95c26e5ae)

Research, Scholarship and Innovation: Recent Keynotes and Conferences organised:

Member of the Organizing Committee of the Annual World Proteome HUPO Organisation 2017 meeting held in Dublin in September 2017, chaired by UCD Prof. Stephen Pennington. Conference Gala dinner was opened by USA Vice-President Joseph R. Biden (http://hupo2017.ie/news-2/).

Invited to give Lectures and Keynotes at conferences including in USA, Europe, China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, South America. Recent lectures include at Companion Diagnostics & Biomarkers Conference 2019 in Porto, 13th and 14th February 2019; 5th Precision Medicine & Biomarkers Leaders’ Summit, Munich, Sept 2018 & Chair Roundtable on Personalised Medicine & Adverse Events: (http://www.giiconference.com/gel560004/catalog.pdf?1528437050).

Research, Scholarship and Innovation including Policy and Strategy:

Expert in EU European Commission for 15 years, including Future & Emerging technologies (FETOPEN); Innovation Radar Expert; H2020 Societal Challenges 1 (Health); European Research Council.

Previously participated in evaluations for BMBF/DLR in Germany; UK BBSRC; Vinnova in Sweden; IWT in Belgium.

Examples of Science Advisory Boards Membership over past 15 years: Human Protein Atlas, Sweden; ProNova Research Institute Sweden; Complexinc, Switzerland; Atturos Ltd, Dublin.

Policy and Strategy – Seconded National Expert to the European Commission, Brussels:

Seconded as a National Expert in Policy to Brussels to European Commission Research & Innovation (1.10.2013- 30.9.2014) – International Cooperation for Strategy and Policy coordination.

Below you can find a word version of the Prof. Dolores Cahill and Liam Clavin interview that took place in December 2020. I have done my very best to transcribe as accurately as possible. Only on rare occasions, I had to make slight syntax adjustments and add and remove a word for the text to keep flowing.

Interview December 2020

Q: What is your stand on the vaccine, should people take them in relation to the Coronavirus?

A: I would not personally take the mRNA ‘vaccine’ for the Coronavirus, NO. I have said if you pay me ten million pounds I would not take one, and if anyone forcibly injects me like they want to do in Australia, I would sue someone for attempted murder. The reason for me saying this is that I have been looking for 20 years at the immune system and there is a huge issue when they make RNA vaccines against RNA viruses so that over 20 years or 40 years when they trialled them in animal models that up-to one third or half, or all of the animals either got seriously ill or died.

And they have also tested some of these RNA vaccines in humans, in children and in babies and in some of the cases half of the children had serious adverse events and got hospitalised and in one case two babies out of thirty-five in a study, the two babies died.

So that the adverse event and death over the past 20 years related to RNA vaccines had been so significantly bad that zero vaccines have been licensed for coronaviruses EVER!

Q: So a lot of people are going to be pressured into having the vaccine, what can they do to fight that pressure in the workplace and in general life?

A: For these societal changes happening in 2020 (2021) the first thing you say is No. And I would say to someone who is forcing you to take a vaccine to keep your job, or to travel. I would say I am afraid (of the vaccine’s effects), don’t take it and then make a plan.

Q: Are you concerned about the talk of a COVID passport?

A: Yes, I am but we all have inalienable rights, which are rights that have been given to us by being a human and being born and we have the freedom to travel, and we have these rights every single one of us and no one can take them away. So that no one can threaten you or cause you not or to say you can’t travel unless you do something. That is against our fundamental rights, you know I am part of the World Freedom Alliance and a part of that has an education pillar for people have systematically not been educated. We have inalienable rights which include freedom of speech, freedom of travel and bodily integrity. So no one can stop you from freedom of travel, you have that inalienable right that can’t be taken away, so nobody can stop you.

You have freedom of speech and bodily integrity. No one can force you to have a medical intervention such as a PCR test or Vaccine, no one can do that and it is against our rights and the Nuremberg Code. You can not be coerced into having medical treatment to either keep your job or travel.

Q: So what is your overall view of the pandemic is it truth or build on a lie?

A: Search for the health organisation declaration of the 11th of March 2020 and there you will see on the second line that the World Health Organisation says that causative agents were a Coronavirus. What we all should know is Coronaviruses cause only illness and symptoms in the Northern Hemisphere. So that is Asia, North America and Europe between December and April. They declared (WHO) the pandemic on the 11th of March 2020 and they said that in the whole world 4291 people had died.

I have been saying if you are the president or prime minister you have to say, OK how does that compare to every year people die including from influenza-like illnesses? How many people die every year? Every year between 400,000 and 600,000 people die, so we say half a million people. So they declared the pandemic not when something was the same every year not even half, not even one-tenth, twentieth or fiftieth but of one per cent of the number of people die every year (4291 people).

If I was prime minister or president almost at the end of the Coronavirus; ‘flu season is not a reason at all to declare a pandemic. I think fundamentally they should not have declared it. But it is also known for years that people can actually do something themselves, which is to boost their immune system so that fewer people will die and that involved taking things that have won Nobel Prizes. Vitamin D has won a prize and how good it is for our health! Vitamin C and Zinc, and also there are drugs that are working really well. Some are on the World Health Organisation essential medicine of the world because they are so good and so safe including hydroxychloroquine and zinc.

So essentially Coronaviruses can be successfully prevented and treated by some of the FDA licensed drugs and they are the safest treatments, they are Nobel prize-winning treatments. So that if on the 11th of March 2020 there were deaths we shoot have been informed in the world that we could have boosted our immune system with vitamin D, C and Zinc. Prescribe some of the safest drugs in the world, hydroxychloroquine and zinc and no one needed to die.

There was no reason at all to declare a pandemic on the 11th of March 2020 and there was no reason for the lockdown. There was no reason for any of the other measures such as quarantine, social distancing or masks.

Q: What has been your view on lockdown and the effect it has on people?

A: I suppose it is well known for over a hundred years the effects of lockdowns. This is known from fields of economics, such as economics, social science and health. This was well studied in 1930 following The Great depression and this was studied after the banking crises that we have had in 2008 till 2010 and currently. How people study this, is in the increase in unemployment, because it would have been well known if you lock down the economy there will be unemployment, illness and death as a result of the lockdowns.

Symptoms from unemployment, people don’t eat so well, poverty, increase in suicides increase in depression and an increase in diseases such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. So you can exactly say the effects of the lockdown. So any president or prime minister such as Boris Johnson should have said the harm of the lockdown has to be compared with the harm of the Corona Virus. So when they locked down the world on the 11th of March 56 people were dying per day in the world of COVID-19.

We have seven thousand eight hundred million people in the world, people had a chance of dying of 1 in 1.8 million. In Ireland, we have 5 million people in the flu season in Ireland; we have that means that maybe two or three people would have died from COVID-19. The same thing if you have 60 million people in the UK you would be talking about 30 people will die in the whole flu season of COVD-19.

A Swiss study showed that for every percentage increase in unemployment during six months of lockdown was equivalent to losing six months of life.

Everybody in the United Kingdom would lose 6 months of life. You have 60 million people in the UK so the harm of the six months of lockdown for everybody alive in the UK has jointly lost 30 millions years of life. So everybody will die six months younger because of the lockdown.

Every day of the lockdown in 2020 there is a reduction of at least 1 day on average of the life of everyone in the country. You have to compare that with the number of people who have died of COVID-19 which would have been a handful of people. If people were getting informed that they could protect themselves with vitamin D, C and zinc. If doctors actually would have published that they are some of the safest drugs in the world hydroxychloroquine and zinc would have been given. We could actually have prevented all of the deaths of COVID-19.

So the harm of bad analyses is, that the harm of lockdowns is much worse. To put that just in numbers, Ireland has 5 million people and the unemployment in Ireland has gone from 5% in February 2020 to over 25%. We have lost again 2.5 million years of life lost in Ireland for the six months of lockdown. The real deaths, the actual deaths in Ireland are actually 100 people died from the lockdown between January 2020 and the beginning of September 2020.

So if you look at the harm of the lockdown it is much worse, therefore, I have been calling since May that the lockdown should be stopped immediately. Not that we aren’t worried about the people that may die of COVID-19. But actually, Coronaviruses only kill until April so there are really no deaths from May onwards.

But if the harm of the lockdown is ten or twenty times more people are dying, then we have a duty of care for the people a responsibility. The prime ministers the advisors, the ministers of health have a responsibility to not bring in policies that clearly harm more people. So I would clearly say the harm of the lockdown in the UK and Ireland and across the world is multiple times worse than the Coronavirus illnesses, which can be entirely prevented and treated.

Q: Masks, are they effective you don’t wear one tell us about the masks?

A: The first thing that I will get back to is the 11th of March 2020. If you have the disease (identify) then you can treat everyone so nobody needs to die – you don’t need a lockdown. If you don’t need the lockdown you don’t need the social distancing, quarantines and wearing masks.

There is no need for the masks and the reason you can show that is that the Coronaviruses do cause illness in the peak January, February March (season) and Ireland has 5 million people and the number of people who have died from COVID-19 in January, February, March in Ireland was Zero. Zero people; official statistics CSO data quarter one. The first death was the 5th of April this was without masks, without social distancing.

Therefore you do not need masks but it is well known from physiology that we need oxygen to live and the masks clearly and verifiably reduce the oxygen that you take in to dangerously low levels, but increase your carbon dioxide. Most of the time when you breathe in and breath out you are talking about 400 parts per million in the air and you breathe out slightly higher. But if you wear the Masks for even a few minutes the carbon dioxide levels that you breath out will go above toxic levels so 2000 parts per million and can go up to 5000 parts per million.

There are health regulatory standards called the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards in the United States and Germany. In the United States for example if you are working in an environment with 2000 parts per million carbon dioxide that is supposed to be unsafe and you can sue your employer and you don’t have to work there.

So when people are wearing masks they are probably in an environment of twice that, like children in school or people who are working because the carbon dioxide behind the mask is actually at toxic levels and they are poisoning themselves. They essentially are being required to wear masks which cause significant illness and the mask also captures a lot of the fungi, microorganisms and viruses in the masks which are then re-breathed and there is an increase in the disease of pleurisy. But the major significant issue is because of the reduction of oxygen, the symptoms of migraines, and chronic fatigue. It has been shown that after two hours of neurological studies in Germany that you can get irreversible damage to the brain after two hours.

Q: What would you say to people who are not brave enough to get rid off their masks, to take their masks off?

A: I would never wear a mask, but as you know there can be quite a lot of aggression for not wearing a mask. The reason is that Coronaviruses only cause an illness and it is known for decades between December, January, February, March and April and then the next December. There is no need for the mask and the people shouldn’t even be challenging people for wearing one.

Coronaviruses are actually spread when they fall on surfaces like a door handle and not spread through the aerosols method. The masks, there is been done an analogy that the gap in the mask is like a fly going through goal posts. Even if you are breathing in the viruses the masks actually can not stop the transmission of the virus.

The first thing that needs to be said;

1. Are the masks necessary, NO?
2. Do they have any benefit in relation to the virus, NO
3. Are they causing more harm than good because you are actually reducing your oxygen and increasing your carbon dioxide, YES HUGELY?

So therefore for all these reasons you should say NO. Anybody wearing a mask is going to reduce their oxygen levels and capture more fungi and microorganisms. And trap them into their lungs and actually have symptoms like reduced oxygen, migraines and cornic fatigue. So I would not wear a mask, and I have not worn a mask throughout this although it has been tough a lot of the time and I would not encourage people to wear a mask.

Unfortunately, people will look back on this in years to come and would say it was probably one of the most harmful policies because when people have reduced oxygen like students in classrooms they will have reduced ability to learn and their brain cognition will actually go down. It is entirely unnecessary, no healthy child has died from COVID-19.

It is well known that reduction of oxygen can damage the brain. The same is for the elderly, it can actually induce diseases and can put pressure on the immune system and the heart when you don’t have enough oxygen. I think it is one of the worst policies and decisions ever and one of the worst harmful of the people in the UK.

I would say if you are in a job and where you are required to wear a mask I would say try to find another job or create your own job. It is not worth it, it is damaging your health, do not wear a mask.

Prof. Dolores Cahill website:

Full video click here